Posts with a general informational nature

How Federal Dollars Are Tied To Schools In 2021 & Beyond – From: GOFM

 Thank you Guardians of Freedom Michigan for bringing this to our attention.

“How Federal Dollars Are Tied To Schools In 2021 & Beyond”
Go to this link to find the blog mentioned in this video: reedommichigan.org/blog-1
By |2022-08-21T22:57:20-04:00August 18, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Dr. Dan Stock, Indiana – Addressing the School Board

Here is it in text, and it’s entirety.

Dr. Dan Stock, Indiana

Addressing the School Board

https://www.bitchute.com/video/qcaTxXq04Np1/?fbclid=IwAR0UlnD62UnX_XPFQZUp1NCFYxXAab4245ZluSzkfBIsK_RxvPPXjeziIAw

“It’s hard to believe we’re 18 months into this and still having a problem; and I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State Board of Health and the CDC, who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this. 

I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation. And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science. 

So, things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses: they are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask. By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we’ve presented to you; it’s been given to the secretary. As a matter of fact, it quotes about three studies, sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and the NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done. 

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long, waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged as has happened recently with these V’s, and then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs—and this is a very important point—no one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs; the only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we were able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this any more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done. 

Equally important is that the V changes none of this, especially with this V. And I would hope this board would start asking itself, before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH, and the State Board of Health why we are doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus, and then ask yourself, why is a V that is supposedly so effective having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that?

And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called antibody-mediated viral enhancement. That is a condition done when V’s work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus, where a V used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which cannot be done right for a respiratory virus which has a very low pathogenicity rate —causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection. And that is why you are seeing an outbreak right now. 

In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you and in the emails with six extra will be a study showing that 75% of people who have had COVID-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, MA, outbreak, were fully V’nated. Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person, V’nated, any differently than any person, un-V’nated. 

You should also know that no V, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection. In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down with symptoms were the people who were un-V’nated or unknown V status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for V’s, but a question that you should ask yourself— knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an un-V’nated or unknown V status individual —where did they get the disease? 

And the answer was: from the V’nated individuals. No V prevents you from getting infection. You get infected. You shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it. So you CANNOT stop spread. You cannot make these numbers, that you’ve planned on, get better by doing any of the things you’re doing. Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can’t prevent it with a V because they don’t do the very thing you’re wanting them to do. And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance. 

And instead, read the articles that are going to come on the email and are on this flash drive, and listen to the people in this audience tonight, who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and NIH is counterfactual. And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this V that supposedly was going to make all of this go away, but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of COVID-19 develop in the middle of the summer, when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary for any V restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over 15 COVID-19 patients, that between active loading with Vit D, Iver _mect _in, and z_- nc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital. And we already have studies that show if you achieve a 25 hydroxy Vit D level greater than 55, your risk of COVID-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population, average, for the United States. And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.

So if you were going to discriminate based upon V, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy Vit D level, z_- nc taste test response, and probably previous infection, since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from COVID-19 infection actually get no benefit from the V at all —no reduction of symptoms, no reduction of hospitalization and suffer 2 to 4 times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently V’nated. Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual. 

I don’t blame this board for that, because I know you aren’t scientists, and you thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH, and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive. 

And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you, individually, if you would like to explain the science behind this. And if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you, you have a free, pro-bono, expert testimony at your disposal. I will testify in defense of this board turning down all recommendations, for free, at any time, in any court. 

Thank you.”

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By |2022-09-23T10:38:34-04:00August 10, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Is your employer or education system mandating …. ?


Is your employer or education system mandating your compliance to any medical procedure, treatment or service as a condition of employment or attendance?

Read and understand this fully before trying to apply it to your situation.

*Disclaimer: The information provided here does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes to address vaccination mandates.

It is my desire to be fully informed and apprised of ALL facts before making medical decisions, and so; I write with regard to the matter of potential COVID-19 vaccine.

I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?

6. Can you please confirm that graphene oxide, a known toxin, is not in the vaccine? 

7. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employer?

8. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract COVID-19 and the likelihood of recovery?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.

2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?


I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.


By |2022-08-21T22:57:21-04:00July 31, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Catch Tim Brown’s interview with Katherine Henry at Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 6 am EST

 

Catch Tim Brown’s interview with Katherine Henry on SonsOfLibertyRadio.com (SonsOfLibertyMedia.com) Tuesday, July 20, 2021 at 6 am EST, regarding her case and her fight for our constitutional rights.

You can also watch it streaming on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/BradleeDeanSOL and Rumble at: https://rumble.com/user/sonsoflibertyradiolive

#RestoreFreedom #ConstitutionMatters #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #OathOfOffice #1stAmendment 

By |2026-04-15T16:33:42-04:00July 19, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Happy Declaration of Independence Day!

Those that signed the Declaration of Independence had reason to do so, they even listed them, so we would not forget.  

“The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.”

Go here to read the full Declaration of Independence: https://www.archives.gov/founding…/declaration-transcript

Today we celebrate that freedom, tomorrow we continue to fight for it.

#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #DeclarationofIndependence #ConstitutionMatters

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By |2022-09-23T10:57:54-04:00July 4, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Kristen just wanted to share her expertise at the Hudsonville School Board Meeting…

 

https://rumble.com/vfqr3t-listen-to-expert-kristen-meghan.html

Kristen just wanted to share her expertise at the Hudsonville School Board Meeting…  this is what she would have shared with the board members and parents had she been allowed to speak.

If you’re able, please help Kristen fund her legal case regarding discrimination.  Even $5 helps!  https://gofund.me/ae79f8c7

**Edit adding the speech and the picture she was sharing on screen**

#RestoreFreedom

#KnowledgeIsPower

#ConstitutionMatters

#MoreFreedomLessGovernment

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By |2022-08-21T23:00:19-04:00April 16, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Shocking footage of harassment and discrimination in Hudsonville, MI

https://rumble.com/vfq59n-kristen-meghan-kelly-being-denied-access-by-the-hudsonville-superintendent.html

Watch this shocking footage of how those with disabilities are harassed and discriminated against right here in Hudsonville, MI.

Are you ready to support our freedom fighter Kristen Meghan Kelly?  WE ARE! Join us in donating to her legal team (with We the Patriots USA) to fight Delta airlines and now our own local Hudsonville schools for unlawfully discriminating against the disabled who are unable to ma$k!  THIS MUST BE STOPPED.

Can’t donate?  Please SHARE and PRAY as this fight takes its toll on Kristen.  She needs and deserves our support. ❤️ 

#freedomfighter #RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment

Ways to donate:

 https://wethepatriotsusa.org/patriot-support-network/

Donating directly to the link above allows your donation to be tax deductible. 

You may also donate via:

https://gofund.me/ae79f8c7

Venmo:@kristen-meghan

Cash app: $Kristenmeghan

https://www.paypal.me/Kristenmeghankelly

If you donate via her private accounts please put “legal” in the subject.

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By |2022-08-21T23:00:19-04:00April 16, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Barry-Eaton District Health Department Board Meeting….

The Barry-Eaton District Health Department board met Friday, 3/26. The board is comprised of 3 commissioners from Barry and 3 commissioners from Eaton. They were asked to reduce all regulatory costs to the hard hit restaurants. 

Jon Smelker (Barry) with the support of Ben Geiger (Barry) and Dave Jackson (Barry) led the charge to have licensing fees waived for restaurants in the district but were met with push back from the Eaton County members of the board.

These are the names and phone numbers to the commissioners that occupy the board from Eaton County.  If you’re in Eaton County, please take a moment to compel these members to offer the regulatory costs relief to the restaurants. 

Joe Brehler

517-882-7491

Blake Mulder

517-331-7435

Jeremy Whittum

517-243-5692

This will be the main topic at our April 8 meeting in Freeport of which you are welcome to come. 7 pm at 223 Division Street in Freeport.

By |2022-08-21T23:00:20-04:00March 28, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Access may be denied for property NOT ordinarily open to the public…..

Access may be denied for property NOT ordinarily open to the public, but may NOT be denied to property “open to the public generally” unless the excluded person is 1) obstructing normal operations or 2) interfering with others’ rights of normal use of the property. People so excluded could be charged with disturbing the peace, usually under MCL 750.167 or 750.170. But, regardless of ownership, members of the general public may NOT be excluded from property open to the general public “through the use of trespass laws.” If you are not impeding normal operations or directly interfering with the rights of others, you are NOT disturbing the peace; and if on property open to the general public, you are NOT trespassing, nor may you be excluded through criminal trespass laws.

Using my Allegan County case to help fight for freedom statewide…
By |2026-03-30T11:36:21-04:00March 27, 2021|Categories: Allegan Trespass Case, Court Documents, Info, Laws|2 Comments

Wondering why I’ve been a bit quiet? Worried I’ve stopped fighting for freedom? No fear, Katherine Henry’s still here! Here’s just a tiny bit of what I’ve been working on these last couple of months:

Wondering why I’ve been a bit quiet? Worried I’ve stopped fighting for freedom? No fear, Katherine Henry’s still here! Here’s just a tiny bit of what I’ve been working on these last couple of months:

Certainly, “the Due Process Clause offers two separate types of protections – substantive and procedural.” Upper Peninsula Power Co v Village of L’anse, ___ Mich App ___ (2020) (Docket No. 349833). Substantive due process is at issue here through subject matter jurisdiction which “‘concerns a court’s abstract power to try a case of the kind or character of the one pending and is not dependent on the particular facts of the case.’” People v Lown, 488 Mich 242, 268 (2011). Aside from the various substantive due process issues in this case, this Constitutional Catastrophe exposes several procedural due process violations against Defendant’s rights, as well. Given the legal right Defendant had to be on the public property, and that a deputy’s plain ignorance of the law (as opposed to a reasonable misinterpretation of the law) cannot create a basis for probable cause, Defendant’s arrest was made without probable cause, violating her right to due process. Moreover, given the circumstances, an arrest by physically taking Defendant into custody was unreasonable. Even more so, the excessive use of force and intentional infliction of emotional distress upon Defendant is beyond unjustifiable.
 
Furthermore, “[p]rocedural due process requires notice, an opportunity to be heard, and an impartial decisionmaker.” Upper Peninsula Power Co v Village of L’anse, ___ Mich App ___ (2020) (Docket No. 349833). Regarding the notice requirement, in a criminal case that means “the accused shall . . . be informed of the nature of the accusation.” Const 1963, art I, § 20. See also US Const, Am VI. However, on November 3, 2020, Defendant was issued Ticket SH 166684 (Exhibit 11, Civil Infraction Copy of Ticket 166684), and the copy with which Defendant was served is nearly impossible to read for the incident number section, date, case type, MCL Cite, Description, Complainant’s Signature, Officer’s Name, and Officer’s ID number. Then, after issuing the citation and serving it upon Defendant, Deputy Langlois altered the ticket before filing it with the court. Consequently, the ticket issued and served upon Defendant is substantially different than the ticket filed with the court (Exhibit 12, Court Copy 1 of Ticket 166684).
 
In fact, this case was legally commenced as a civil infraction, yet without ever serving Defendant criminal process, it is being prosecuted as a misdemeanor. [A “civil infraction action is commenced upon the issuance and service of a citation,” so the case against Defendant commenced on November 3rd upon Deputy Langlois issuing and serving Defendant civil infraction Ticket SH 166684. MCL 257.741(1). The procedural requirements for citations, although found in the Michigan Vehicle Code, apply when those same citation forms are used in non-traffic cases per MCL 257.727c (2) and MCL 264.9c. See also, SCAO Administrative Memorandum 2003-06, Michigan Uniform Law Citation.] Indeed, our criminal laws and procedures require the citation, or notice, given to defendants to be as complete as possible, specifically stating the substance of the accusation. Code of Criminal Procedure, MCL 764.1d; MCR 6.101 (“The complaint must include the substance of the accusation against the accused and the name and statutory citation of the offense.); MCL 257.728(1). The only description of the offence is “MCL 750.552 Trespass.” Having absolutely no descriptive words does not describe the alleged illegal conduct as completely as possible, nor does it recite the substance of the accusation. Clearly this does not qualify as the required complaint stating all the facts and circumstances constituting the statutory offense. People v Husted, 52 Mich 624 (1884).
 
Additionally, the “constitutional safeguards relating to the integrity of the criminal process attend every stage of a criminal proceeding, starting with arrest.” Cox v Louisiana, 379 US 559, 562 (1965). This means that all Defendants must be afforded open access to the courts, just the same as other litigants, according to the court rules. However, Defendant was denied that equal and fair access to the court. On November 12, 2020, when Defendant spoke with the court to get a hearing date, she was told the January 11, 2021 date would be both for her arraignment and for her motion for summary disposition. Yet, when she called to inquire about the court’s preferred e-filing method, she was told that she was not allowed to have the hearing on her motion for summary disposition until some undisclosed time after her arraignment. Id. at p 2 (highlighted portion). However, this directly conflicts with MCR 2.116(B)(2), which allows “a motion under this rule [to] be filed any time.” (Further, the SCAO Misdemeanor Arraignments Flow Chart clearly states in a highlighted box off to the side on both pages that “Motions can be scheduled anytime before and after adjudication.” Available at https://www.courts.michigan.gov/siteassets/publications/benchbooks/qrms/criminal/crim-pro-pretrial-trial/misdemeanor-arraignment-flowchart.pdf?r=1, accessed February 13, 2021.) The “constitutional safeguards attending every stage of a criminal proceeding” also means that when a due process issue or subject matter jurisdiction issue gets presented to a judge, it is improper and a dereliction of duty to claim no “authority” and pass it off to the judge at the next hearing. Yet when Defendant raised these issues to the judge at arraignment, he responded, “Well that’s something to take up at the pre-trial conference then, okay? . . . I have no authority to do anything today other than to tell you what the deputy has charged you with.”
 
From the judge rolling his eyes during Defendant’s oral argument on her motion for summary disposition, to the dismissive manner Defendant and her attorney Greg Todd were treated at the February 4th hearing (showing no respect for either as officers of the court), to the aggressive manner Defendant and her attorney are treated by deputies each time upon arrival to the courthouse, one wonders how this could possibly amount to a fair and impartial process. This is all despite the US Supreme Court holding that procedural due process requires the alleged to be given notice of the proceedings against him, an opportunity to defend himself, as well as the assurance that the matter will be conducted in a fair manner. Hannah v Larche, 363 US 420 (1960), reh den 364 US 855 (1960). The following portions discuss the remaining due process violations in more detail, starting with the one requiring dismissal with prejudice.
By |2022-10-11T15:52:39-04:00March 14, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

“A reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.”

 “A reasonably competent public official should know the law governing his conduct.”  Spurlock v Satterfield, 167 F3d 995, 1006 (1999), citing Harlow v Fitzgerald, 457 US 800, 818-819 (1982).  

In other words, even the US Supreme Court agrees that ignorance of the law is NO excuse for ANY public official!  And if you are a public official and take offense to this post, then, YES, it is for YOU!

#RestoreFreedom #OathOfOffice #WeThePeople #ConstitutionMatters #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #RuleOfLaw

By |2022-08-21T23:00:21-04:00March 11, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments

Are You Medically Exempt?

It’s QUIZ TIME!  How do you know if you are MEDICALLY EXEMPT?

Can you answer “yes” to any of these health conditions in your current or medical history?  Your employer CANNOT FORCE YOU TO MA$k and MUST accommodate you.  All employers should be giving EVERY employee this survey, but none are.  

If employers were truly concerned about health they wouldn’t be blindly mandating these measures on employees without considering past and current health conditions.

See something on this that applies to you?  YOU ARE EXEMPT. Stop complying, you are harming yourself.

Confidently tell the greeter who is forced to ask you if you need a face covering that YOU ARE EXEMPT.

Your health is more important than your compliance.

#MaskDown

#RestoreFreedom

#MoreFreedomLessGovernment

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By |2022-08-21T23:00:22-04:00February 17, 2021|Categories: Info|3 Comments

Letter from Laura Cox:

 Letter from Laura Cox:

“Michigan Republicans,

I know emotions have been running high these last 24 hours for many, but I want you to know the real facts before voting for MRP Chairman tomorrow at State Convention. 

1) There was $60,000 paid to Stan Grot, starting 3 days after he dropped out of the 2018 August State Convention, with an additional $140,000 paid to Mr. Grot with no contract and no work product just days before I became Chair. 

2) These payments to Mr. Grot were clearly corrupt and defrauded the convention delegates. What is to prevent Ron Weiser from doing that in 2022? Anyone who abides by this or makes excuses for it, is allowing the corruption to continue.  

3) A vote for me is a vote against corruption. If delegates so chose to vote against Ron Weiser this Saturday at Convention, I will submit my resignation immediately, and receive no pay. 

If you think what Ron did is okay, then vote for him. If you don’t want backroom deals and secret payoffs, then vote for me. The choice is clear.

If anyone has any questions or concerns, you can always reach me directly at Laura@LauraForChair.com.

Thank you & God Bless.

Laura Cox”

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By |2022-09-23T10:42:33-04:00February 5, 2021|Categories: Info|6 Comments

Officers Shall Be Bound By the Constitution

ALL state and federal senators, representatives, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, and judicial officers “SHALL BE BOUND BY OATH or Affirmation, to SUPPORT THIS CONSTITUTION.”  US Const, art VI  #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #RestoreFreedom #liberty #ConstitutionMatters #OathOfOffice

By |2022-08-21T23:03:45-04:00January 26, 2021|Categories: Info|0 Comments
Go to Top