Throwback Thursday: US v Lopez (1995)

2A Threatened by SCOTUS’ interpretation of the Commerce Clause! In 1992, high school senior Alfonso Lopez carried a concealed ? into school, & found guilty of violating the Gun-Free School Zones Act. On appeal in US v Lopez (1995), SCOTUS held the Act exceeded Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause (there was no other constitutional authority for it). SCOTUS reminded us “the Constitution creates a Federal Government of enumerated powers,” and “the powers delegated . . . to the federal government are few and defined.” SCOTUS then held Congress could only regulate INTRAstate activity that substantially affects INTERstate commerce if the INTRAstate activity is economic in nature. But, as Congress amended the Act to require the prosecutor to prove the ? “moved in or otherwise affects INTERstate commerce,” it is now considered “constitutional.” So much for the 2nd Amendment!

By |2026-04-29T16:13:36-04:00April 30, 2026|Categories: Throwback Thursday|0 Comments

Are Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Constitutional? Part 1: Homeland Security & Coast Guard S5E17

Are federal law enforcement agencies constitutional? With over 70 active Federal Law Enforcement Agencies, this video series focuses on the 24 most widely known agencies and the Departments to which they each belong. The answer on Constitutionality is not the same for each agency. Some agencies are entirely unconstitutional. Some are exercising constitutionally-acceptable authority, but by the wrong government entity. Others are appropriately exercising constitutional authority by the appropriate entity. 

PART 1 of this video series explains the relevant constitutional provisions, then addresses the Constitutionality of the Department of Homeland Security and the US Coast Guard.

PART 2 of this video series focuses on the US Secret Service, TSA, ICE, CBP & FPS

PART 3 of this video series focuses on the DOJ, ATF, FBI, US Marshals, Bureau of Prisons, Dept of Agriculture, US Forest Service Law Enforcement & Investigations, EPA Criminal Investigative Division

PART 4 of this video series focuses on the DOD, NSA, NCIS, CID, AFOSI, Dept of State, Diplomatic Security Service, Dept of Treasury, Office of Inspector General, Dept of Interior, National Park Service Law Enforcement Rangers

PART 5 of this video series focuses on the Independent Agencies: CIA, CSOSA, US Capitol Police, and the Amtrak Police Department; and a Summary of Parts 1-5 

Document referenced in  this video series found at https://restorefreedomkh.com/FedLEOs

By |2026-08-11T14:28:52-04:00April 30, 2026|Categories: Podcast, Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Never before seen footage from the day we “stormed the capital!” 043020

Watch Never before seen footage from the day we “stormed the capital!” 043020 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy70X-k9r4A

Google photos automatically compiled this video together based on videos and photos I have from the day (04/30/20) we showed up in vast numbers to protest against the republican-led legislature attempting to adopt Governor Whitmer’s executive orders as laws. Although I would have compiled it a bit differently, I figured it was still worth sharing as is…

By |2026-04-30T16:54:52-04:00April 29, 2026|Categories: Event, How it all started|0 Comments

Can Congress Attach Strings to Funds it Gives to the States? Why This Matters to You! S5E16

SCOTUS making rules for how the Feds dish out YOUR tax dollars to state governments ?

Last week, we talked about South Dakota v Dole (1987), where SCOTUS laid out 5 limits on Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to the states. But there’s some major concerns with how SCOTUS has handled these issues. They come up with all these rules and tests for determining and defining the powers of the federal government – but they don’t have the authority to set the “rules.” We The People set out the rules within the contract itself – the US Constitution. So, what does the Constitution say about Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to the states?

See more at https://restorefreedomkh.com/2026/04/23/scotus-imposed-limits-on-congress-power-to-attach-strings-to-funds-for-states/

By |2026-08-11T14:28:52-04:00April 29, 2026|Categories: Podcast, Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Can Congress Attach Strings to Funds it Gives to the States? Why This Matters to You! S5E16

Watch Can Congress Attach Strings to Funds it Gives to the States? Why This Matters to You! S5E16 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aimgS-qmWvU

?????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ????? ??????????? ?

Last week, we talked about South Dakota v Dole (1987), where SCOTUS laid out 5 limits on Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to the states. But there’s some major concerns with how SCOTUS has handled these issues. They come up with all these rules and tests for determining and defining the powers of the federal government – but they don’t have the authority to set the “rules.” We The People set out the rules within the contract itself – the US Constitution. So, what does the Constitution say about Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to the states?

See more at https://ift.tt/WjznA9P

By |2026-04-30T16:50:32-04:00April 29, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Wellness Wednesday #17

Some toxins to watch out for are in our food, others in our personal care products, and some are in both.  Avobenzone is found in our personal care products. It is common in sunscreens, skincare, cosmetics, hair care, fragrances, detergents, and plastics. Why don’t you want Avobenzone?  High Systemic Absorption: It stays in blood, urine, and breast milk weeks after use, raising concerns about long-term internal exposure. Hormone Disruption: It has shown “pro-estrogenic” activity in lab tests, meaning it may interfere with natural hormone signaling. Degradation and Free Radicals: When exposed to sunlight, it begins to break down within 30 minutes. This process not only reduces sun protection but also generates free radicals, which can damage skin cells and accelerate premature aging. Contact Dermatitis: It is a frequent cause of photoallergic reactions. Some users experience redness, itching, or rashes specifically when the applied product is exposed to the sun.

By |2026-03-06T14:44:13-05:00April 29, 2026|Categories: Medical Updates / Scientific Updates|0 Comments

Liberty Lawyer takes YOUR legal questions LIVE! S5E15

Watch Liberty Lawyer takes YOUR legal questions LIVE! S5E15 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XanwM02fgHE

In our 4/28/26 LIVE call-in show, we took your calls from Pennsylvania, Michigan and beyond on topics like neighborhood watches, candidate forums, qualified immunity, and 4th amendment! Join us next time to have YOUR Constitutional questions answered!

Donate to Restore Freedom at RestoreFreedomKH.com/Donate or shop RF gear at RestoreFreedomKH.com/Shop!

By |2026-04-30T16:57:27-04:00April 29, 2026|Categories: Restore Freedom Weekly|0 Comments

Liberty Lawyer takes YOUR legal questions LIVE! S5E15

In our 4/28/26 LIVE call-in show, we took your calls from Pennsylvania, Michigan and beyond on topics like neighborhood watches, candidate forums, qualified immunity, and 4th amendment! Join us next time to have YOUR Constitutional questions answered! Donate to Restore Freedom at RestoreFreedomKH.com/Donate or shop RF gear at RestoreFreedomKH.com/Shop!

By |2026-08-11T14:28:52-04:00April 28, 2026|Categories: Podcast, Restore Freedom Weekly|0 Comments

Low Cost Constitutional Education!

Are you fiscally conservative? Me, too! That’s why we have a way for you to spread the word about Freedom & the Constitution for less than $7! Put one of these window decals on your car, home or business and passersby can simply scan the QR code to learn how to #RestoreFreedom ! $6.75 includes shipping!! RestoreFreedomKH.com/shop

By |2026-04-30T16:35:19-04:00April 28, 2026|Categories: Restore Freedom Goodies|0 Comments

SCOTUS Lifts Lower Court Block on New Texas Congressional Election Map

The US Supreme Court lifted the lower court block on the new Texas Congressional Election Map. The ruling means the new map that favors Republicans will remain in place for the November congressional elections. Court’s Order: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/042726zor_08l1.pdf
#EpochTimes #Election #SCOTUS

By |2026-04-27T11:28:57-04:00April 27, 2026|Categories: Legal Updates|0 Comments

Candidate Forum – Are these Congressional, State, County & Local Candidates Constitutional? 042026

Watch Candidate Forum – Are these Congressional, State, County & Local Candidates Constitutional? 042026 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayl-BcQT-Xw

This is a Volusia County Candidate Forum, hosted by Volusia Overwatch, and Moderated by Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry, joined with Mark Murphy. Are these Congressional, State, County & Local Candidates Constitutional? Watch how these 14 candidates answer the questions and see for yourself!

Thank you to the following candidates for participating in this forum:
State & Federal
Cong Dist 6 – Aaron Baker
Cong Dist 7 – Michael Don Johnson
Cong Dist 7 – Sarah Ulrich
FL Senate Dist 8 – Jason Volez
FL Senate Dist 8 – Gabe Wosniak
FL CFO – Dr Frank W. Colliage
Volusia County
VC Council At Large – Mike Pionatowski
VC Council Dist 1- Melissa D. Thorne
VC Council Dist 5 – David Sosa
VC School Bd Dist 1 – Brenda Beery
VC School Bd Dist 1 – Jaclyn Carrell
City Commission
Deltona Comm – Kim Eddins
OB Zone 1 – Coleen McMahan
OB Zone 2 – Jennifer Bright

By |2026-04-30T16:56:23-04:00April 27, 2026|Categories: Event, Local Government|0 Comments

Candidate Forum – Are these Congressional, State, County & Local Candidates Constitutional? 042026

This is a Volusia County Candidate Forum, hosted by Volusia Overwatch, and Moderated by Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry, joined with Mark Murphy. Are these Congressional, State, County & Local Candidates Constitutional? Watch how these 14 candidates answer the questions and see for yourself! 

Thank you to the following candidates for participating in this forum:
State & Federal                                                         
Cong Dist 6 – Aaron Baker                              
Cong Dist 7 – Michael Don Johnson                  
Cong Dist 7 – Sarah Ulrich                          
FL Senate Dist 8 – Jason Volez                          
FL Senate Dist 8 – Gabe Wosniak                          
FL CFO – Dr Frank W. Colliage        
Volusia County
VC Council At Large – Mike Pionatowski
VC Council Dist 1- Melissa D. Thorne
VC Council Dist 5 – David Sosa
VC School Bd Dist 1 – Brenda Beery        
VC School Bd Dist 1 – Jaclyn Carrell
City Commission
Deltona Comm – Kim Eddins
OB Zone 1 – Coleen McMahan
OB Zone 2 – Jennifer Bright

By |2026-08-11T14:28:52-04:00April 27, 2026|Categories: Event, Local Government, Podcast|0 Comments

God in the Kansas Constitution

Separation of church & state or God in the Constitution? Kansas’ Constitution specifically acknowledges Almighty God with statements like “We, the people of Kansas, grateful to Almighty God for our civil and religious privileges, in order to insure the full enjoyment of our rights as American citizens, do ordain and establish this constitution of the state of Kansas.”

By |2026-03-24T18:45:48-04:00April 26, 2026|Categories: Biblical Insight, State Constitution|0 Comments

Freedom Fighting Tools – Judicial Codes of Conduct

You don’t like what a judge did in your case. What can you do about it? If the law is on your side, you should consider an appeal. But if the judge’s conduct was egregious, you may have other options. The first step in knowing if the judge can face personal accountability for misconduct is to read your state’s Code of Judicial Conduct. The Florida Code of Judicial Conduct is at https://floridajqc.com/code-of-conduct/, and the Michigan Code of Judicial Conduct is at https://restorefreedomkh.com/4viz #FreedomFightingTool #BeInformed

By |2026-03-23T15:06:55-04:00April 24, 2026|Categories: Freedom Fighting Tools|Tags: |0 Comments

Throwback Thursday: South Dakota v Dole (1987)

Congress enacted a law to get states to raise their drinking age to 21, withholding some federal highway funds from states that wouldn’t. South Dakota’s drinking age was 19, so they sued. In South Dakota v Dole (1987), SCOTUS laid out 5 limits on Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to states. 1st: Congress’ spending “must be in pursuit of ‘the general welfare.'” 2nd: Congress must place conditions on the funds “unambiguously.” (States need to know the conditions before accepting “federal” money.) 3rd: the conditions must relate to “the federal interest” for which the spending program was established. 4th: “[o]ther constitutional provisions may provide an independent bar to conditional grant of funds.” 5th: a condition becomes unconstitutional when “the financial inducement offered by Congress” coerces the states to take certain action. In cases decided after Dole, SCOTUS primarily focused on the 5th factor – whether a spending condition was coercive. WHY THIS IS WRONG: https://wp.me/pecX6i-4i0!

By |2026-04-23T13:43:21-04:00April 23, 2026|Categories: Throwback Thursday|0 Comments

SCOTUS-Imposed Limits on Congress’ Power to Attach Strings to Funds for States

This week, we’re talking about South Dakota v Dole (1987), where SCOTUS laid out 5 limits on Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to the states. But there’s some major concerns with how SCOTUS has handled these issues. They come up with all these rules and tests for determining and defining the powers of the federal government – but they don’t have the authority to set the “rules.” We The People set out the rules within the contract itself – the US Constitution. So, what does the Constitution say about Congress’ power to attach strings on money given to the states? Congress’ powers our largely outlined in US Constitution Article 1, Section 8. In Section 8, “Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defence [sic] and general welfare of the United States.” It doesn’t say Congress has the power to tax the people to give that money to the states. No where in the Constitution does Congress have authority to just hand over a pile of money to the states. “Providing for” the general welfare literally means “to pay for.” But that does not by itself give Congress the authority to take any and all actions under the guise of it being “for the general welfare of the US.” The “things” Congress can do are still limited by the list of items specifically entrusted to Congress in Article 1, Section 8. Those things include the power to:

  • lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises,
  • pay the debts of the US
  • provide for the common defence [sic] of the US
  • provide for the general welfare of the US
  • borrow money on the credit of the US
  • regulate commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian Tribes
  • establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization
  • establish uniform laws on the subject of bankruptcies
  • coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures
  • provide for the punishment of counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the US
  • establish post offices and post roads
  • promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries
  • constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court
  • define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations
  • declare war, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water
  • raise and support Armies
  • provide and maintain a Navy
  • make Rules for the Government
  • make Regulations of the land and naval Forces
  • provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions
  • provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, (reserving certain authority to the States respectively)
  • exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over [Washington, D.C.] and to exercise like Authority [in D.C.] for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings; -And
  • make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

So, providing for roads which only sober, attentive drivers may utilize to travel from one part of the country to another would fit the itemized power of  “providing for the general welfare of the US,” along with the power to “establish post roads,” and to provide for the common defense. But limiting the drinking age to 21 does not directly implicate any of these powers, let alone the others entrusted to Congress.

So, not only does Congress not have the Constitutional authority to regulate the drinking age, it cannot spend money in a way to ensure the states do so.

Further, the Constitution allows Congress to collect taxes & duties to fund the work it is tasked with doing under Article 1, Section 8. It has no Constitutional authority to tax citizens to turn around and just hand that money over to the states.

By |2026-04-27T11:53:04-04:00April 23, 2026|Categories: Constitution|0 Comments

New SCOTUS Decision: Supremacy Clause, Immunity & Federal Common Law

NEW SCOTUS Decision! Hencely v Fluor Corp. et al (No. 24–924), Decided April 22, 2026. SCOTUS held the Supremacy Clause requires state law to yield only when it conflicts with rights or restrictions that stem from the Constitution or a valid federal statute or treaty (p5, Slip Opinion).  Further, SCOTUS held federal contractors do not automatically share the Government’s immunity merely because they perform services for it (p12-16, Slip Opinion). “Instead, without a federal statute, contractors ordinarily have a constitutional defense only when the contractor is being sued precisely for accomplishing what the Federal Government requested.” Consequently, where a “Government agent had ‘exceeded his authority’ or the authority ‘was not validly conferred’ . . . the agent could be held liable for conduct causing injury to another.” And interestingly, SCOTUS expressly acknowledged their 1938 holding in Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 US 64, 78 that “[t]here is no federal general common law.”

By |2026-04-22T14:47:32-04:00April 22, 2026|Categories: Legal Updates|1 Comment

Wellness Wednesday #16

Some toxins to watch out for are in our food, others in our personal care products, and some are in both. Octinoxate (Octyl methoxycinnamate) is found in our personal care products. Why don’t you want Octinoxate (Octyl methoxycinnamate)? Readily absorbed through the skin, it is linked to thyroid dysfunction and reproductive toxicity.  It is common in sunscreens, cosmetics, hair care, and fragrances.

By |2026-03-06T14:31:36-05:00April 22, 2026|Categories: Medical Updates / Scientific Updates|0 Comments

Combating Dark Money from Special Interest Groups or Outright Discrimination? S5E13

Is this “single cohesive entity” of local candidates appropriately fighting back against Special Interest Groups buying elections? Or are they going beyond that and engaging in outright discrimination? What are your thoughts? My comment to the Candidates’ Statement can be seen at
https://www.facebook.com/groups/VolusiaIssues/posts/4393325220953154/?comment_id=4393483560937320

By |2026-08-11T14:28:52-04:00April 20, 2026|Categories: Podcast, Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Combating Dark Money from Special Interest Groups or Outright Discrimination? S5E13

Watch Combating Dark Money from Special Interest Groups or Outright Discrimination? S5E13 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYMWAtWMFRk

Is this “single cohesive entity” of local candidates appropriately fighting back against Special Interest Groups buying elections? Or are they going beyond that and engaging in outright discrimination? What are your thoughts? My comment to the Candidates’ Statement can be seen at
https://ift.tt/Q2JbsTZ

By |2026-04-26T14:05:06-04:00April 20, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

God in the Iowa Constitution

Separation of church & state or God in the Constitution? Iowa’s Constitution specifically acknowledges our Lord, Supreme Being and our Blessings, with statements like “WE THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF IOWA, grateful to the Supreme Being for the blessings hitherto enjoyed, and feeling our dependence on Him for a continuation of those blessings, do ordain and establish a free and independent government, by the name of the State of Iowa.”

By |2026-03-24T18:45:27-04:00April 19, 2026|Categories: Biblical Insight, State Constitution|1 Comment
Go to Top