About Katherine Henry

Katherine Henry is a Constitutional Attorney & the founder of Restore Freedom. She is a homeschooling mom, wife, Christian, business owner & proud American. Already an advocate for our Constitutionally-protected, God-given liberties, she was outraged by the government's blatantly unconstitutional response to Covid19. In our great country, we don’t have a government of attorneys, political elite or special interest groups. We have a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Since March 2020, Katherine has devoted her entire law practice to educating the public on the Constitution and the law, holding government officials accountable for violating their Constitutional Oaths of Office, and empowering everyday people to make a difference. She’s spoken on the Constitution at hundreds of events, hosts a website full of freedom fighting resources and hundreds of educational videos, launched a weekly Constitution podcast & newsletter, and created a Constitution app for Apple & Android. From writing & organizing a state constitutional amendment petition to assisting in 2020 election fraud cases and arguing in the Michigan Supreme Court against the Governor’s Executive Orders, Katherine has been fighting to Restore our Freedom since day one. A fierce advocate for the truth and the Rule of Law for over 20 years, Katherine fights everyday to restore our government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Her motto: More Freedom, Less Government!

Which of these Congressional Candidates will work for We The People? CD7 Forum 070926

Watch Which of these Congressional Candidates will work for We The People? CD7 Forum 070926 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJfEvC97ZL8

This is a Congressional District 7 (FL) Candidate Forum, hosted by Grassroots Townhall, and Moderated by Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry. Which of these Congressional candidates constitutional? Watch how these 5 candidates answer the questions and see for yourself! [This seat is currently held by incumbent Cory Mills.] Candidates in attendance are: Christopher Dennison (L), Ryan Elijah (R), Mike Johnson (R), Marialana Kinter (D), and Sarah Ulrich (R).

By |2026-07-14T11:59:14-04:00July 10, 2026|Categories: Event|0 Comments

Which of these Congressional Candidates will work for We The People? CD7 Forum 070926

This is a Congressional District 7 (FL) Candidate Forum, hosted by Grassroots Townhall, and Moderated by Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry. Which of these Congressional candidates constitutional? Watch how these 5 candidates answer the questions and see for yourself! [This seat is currently held by incumbent Cory Mills.]

By |2026-07-19T14:24:19-04:00July 10, 2026|Categories: Event, Podcast|0 Comments

102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 6 S5E63

Watch 102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 6 S5E63 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeYb5lStOIQ

What in the world do these words mean? Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry explains the meaning of 102 Most Common Legal Terms in Civil Cases. Watch all 6 parts of this informative miniseries! Then, make sure to look out for our miniseries on General Legal Terms, Criminal Trial Terms, and Appeals Case Terms!

By |2026-07-10T09:37:30-04:00July 10, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Dr. Christina Parks – Valuable Truth Asset

Do you value truth & science? Prefer to get information from reputable sources? Then this week’s #FreedomFightingTool is for you! Dr. Christina Parks is not only a friend of mine, but a treasure trove of valuable medical & scientific information. Find her at https://www.facebook.com/christina.parks.752

By |2026-05-20T11:44:26-04:00July 10, 2026|Categories: Freedom Fighting Tools|0 Comments

Throwback Thursday: Sherbert & the RFRA

Last week, we discussed (https://wp.me/pecX6i-4Cz) how the 14th Am gave Congress power to hold states accountable for violating rights protected in Amdts 1-9. In Sherbert v Verner (1963), SCOTUS held gov’t CANNOT substantially burden free exercise of religion unless it shows it has a compelling interest to do so. But in 1990, SCOTUS changed course in Employment Division v Smith, holding a state CAN substantially burden free exercise of religion, even absent a compelling interest to do so, so long as the law is “neutral” toward religion – meaning, it imposes the same burden on all religions. So, it’s all good, as long as the gov’t stops ALL faiths from practicing?!?! Both Dems & Repubs HATED that case, so they passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) – UNANIMOUSLY in the House, and 97-3 in the Senate! Clinton signed it into law. RFRA restored Sherbert’s more protective test, so once again a law could NOT substantially burden the free exercise of religion without a compelling interest for doing so.

By |2026-07-02T12:16:26-04:00July 9, 2026|Categories: Throwback Thursday|1 Comment

Wellness Wednesday #27

Some toxins to watch out for are in our food & others in our personal care products.  Maltodextrin is found in our food. Why don’t you want Maltodextrin? Blood Sugar Spikes: Its high GI causes rapid sugar and insulin spikes, followed by crashes, potentially leading to fatigue. Lacks Nutrition: It offers calories but no vitamins, minerals, or fiber, providing little nutritional value. Gut Health: Some research suggests it can negatively impact the gut’s mucus barrier, potentially worsening inflammation. Hidden Sugars: It’s often in “sugar-free” items but isn’t counted in sugar totals on labels, deceiving consumers.

By |2026-07-08T07:06:52-04:00July 8, 2026|Categories: Medical Updates / Scientific Updates|0 Comments

102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 5 S5E62

Watch 102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 5 S5E62 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFvVpM144Fo

What in the world do these words mean? Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry explains the meaning of 102 Most Common Legal Terms in Civil Cases. Watch all 6 parts of this informative miniseries! Then, make sure to look out for our miniseries on General Legal Terms, Criminal Trial Terms, and Appeals Case Terms!

By |2026-07-10T09:37:49-04:00July 8, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Low Cost Constitutional Education!

Are you fiscally conservative? Me, too! That’s why we have a way for you to spread the word about Freedom & the Constitution for less than $7! Put one of these window decals on your car, home or business and passersby can simply scan the QR code to learn how to #RestoreFreedom ! $6.75 includes shipping!! RestoreFreedomKH.com/shop

By |2026-04-08T10:59:43-04:00July 7, 2026|Categories: Restore Freedom Goodies|0 Comments

102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 4 S5E61

Watch 102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 4 S5E61 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aB8OE32lcw

What in the world do these words mean? Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry explains the meaning of 102 Most Common Legal Terms in Civil Cases. Watch all 6 parts of this informative miniseries! Then, make sure to look out for our miniseries on General Legal Terms, Criminal Trial Terms, and Appeals Case Terms!

By |2026-07-06T07:59:37-04:00July 6, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

God in the Montana Constitution

Separation of church & state or God in the Constitution? Montana’s Constitution specifically acknowledges God, our Lord, and our Blessings. Indeed, in uniquely artful form, the people of Montana drafted this Constitution Preamble: We the people of Montana grateful to God for the quiet beauty of our state, the grandeur of our mountains, the vastness of our rolling plains, and desiring to improve the quality of life, equality of opportunity and to secure the blessings of liberty for this and future generations do ordain and establish this constitution.

By |2026-05-19T16:07:02-04:00July 5, 2026|Categories: Biblical Insight, State Constitution|0 Comments

102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 3 S5E60

Watch 102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 3 S5E60 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twDZOjl9VE4

What in the world do these words mean? Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry explains the meaning of 102 Most Common Legal Terms in Civil Cases. Watch all 6 parts of this informative miniseries! Then, make sure to look out for our miniseries on General Legal Terms, Criminal Trial Terms, and Appeals Case Terms!

By |2026-07-06T07:56:11-04:00July 4, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

Throwback Thursday: Katzenbach v Morgan (1966)

In Hans v Louisiana (1890), SCOTUS held the 11th Amend. presupposed states have sovereign immunity. Later, though, SCOTUS held 14th Amend, Sec 5 gave Congress authority to override a state’s sovereign immunity, meaning Congress can allow certain kinds of citizen lawsuits against states in federal court. Section 5 gives Congress “power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article,” referring to Sections 1-4 of the 14th Amendment. Section 1 says “nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” So, Congress can make laws to hold states accountable for violating the liberty interests protected by the 1st – 9th Amendments. What does that mean? In Katzenbach v Morgan (1966), SCOTUS held that Sec. 5 gives Congress the power to “remedy or prevent unconstitutional actions.” Has Congress done that? Hardly! So call your Senator & Congressman and demand they give real remedies to people whose states violate their rights!

By |2026-07-02T11:41:43-04:00July 2, 2026|Categories: Throwback Thursday|0 Comments

102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 2 S5E59

Watch 102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 2 S5E59 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3KfwFK4cNU

What in the world do these words mean? Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry explains the meaning of 102 Most Common Legal Terms in Civil Cases. Watch all 6 parts of this informative miniseries! Then, make sure to look out for our miniseries on General Legal Terms, Criminal Trial Terms, and Appeals Case Terms!

By |2026-07-06T07:59:59-04:00July 2, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments

102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 1 S5E58

Watch 102 Most Common Civil Case Terms Defined! Part 1 S5E58 at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF3lCi-kHa8

What in the world do these words mean? Constitutional Attorney Katherine Henry explains the meaning of 102 Most Common Legal Terms in Civil Cases. Watch all 6 parts of this informative miniseries! Then, make sure to look out for our miniseries on General Legal Terms, Criminal Trial Terms, and Appeals Case Terms!

By |2026-06-30T07:45:57-04:00June 30, 2026|Categories: Quick Clarifications|0 Comments
Go to Top