Restore Freedom with Katherine Henry

Debunking the Common Law / King’s Law Myth

With rumors we switched from using “Common Law (God’s law) to Marine Admiralty Law (King’s law),” it’s important to share the TRUTH.  “Common Law” is NOT God’s law, but literally King’s law from England.  God’s law is in the Bible.  And, no, we’re not under Admiralty Law, either.

“Common Law” is NOT God’s law!

Where’s the proof the US is a corporation? There is no such proof. Why are people calling Common Law “God’s law?” Common law is literally judge-made “law,” or case precedent erroneously referred to as “case law.” Why are people advocating for case law?? There is a separation of powers for a reason! Common law is in no way “God’s law,” and is, in fact, no “law” at all!
#ConstitutionMatters #RestoreFreedom

Update from MSP on MJ Crime Lab Testing

This is the update from the Michigan State Police Forensic Science Division regarding positive test results for THC when only CBD is present.  You’ll want to read both pages of the PDF:

The Efforts of the Ottawa Impact PAC Paid Off!

 From Ottawa Impact PAC –

Press Release: August 3, 2022

Ottawa County loves freedom!

Ottawa Impact was built by the efforts of moms and dads, grandparents, hard working Americans, and business owners, who simply desired to have individual freedoms, parental rights, and American values protected in our county.

Our current county commissioners refused to listen and act in defense of these issues— core values to our people and to the Republican Party platform. When elected officials refuse to listen to the people and protect constitutional freedoms, they must be replaced.

The people of Ottawa County have worked tirelessly towards this day. The people have spoken, and overwhelmingly voted to replace those who ignored their freedoms, their parental rights, and their values.


Ottawa Impact-Aligned County Commissioner Candidates – Republican Primary 2022

District Candidate Status
District 1 Gretchen Cosby Democrat opponent in November 2022
District 2 Lucy Ebel Democrat opponent in November 2022
District 3
District 4 Jacob Bonnema Seated January 2023
District 5 Joe Moss Seated January 2023
District 6 Kyle Terpstra Seated January 2023
District 7 Rebekah Curran Seated January 2023
District 8 Sylvia Rhodea Seated January 2023
District 9 Roger Belknap Seated January 2023
District 10 Jenni Shepherd-Kelley See below
District 11 Allison Miedema Seated January 2023

Jenni Shepherd-Kelley fought a valiant race in District 10 and worked to inform and activate her community in the Tri-Cities area. We have tremendous respect for her passion and conviction to defend her district. She lost by 618 votes in a heavy crossover area to progressive incumbent candidate Roger Bergman.

We are thankful for the support and efforts of thousands across Ottawa County. We welcome the voices of parents and courageous individuals as we work to restore freedom, parental rights, and American values in Ottawa County.

For Freedom & Family,

Joe Moss and Sylvia Rhodea
Ottawa Impact PAC

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-22T10:18:03-04:00August 3, 2022|Categories: Informational, Local Government|0 Comments

From The Epoch Times – “Supreme Court Has Decided to Overturn Roe v. Wade, Leaked Opinion Suggests”

Link to article here:

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito poses in Washington on April 23, 2021. (Erin Schaff/Pool via Reuters)
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito poses in Washington on April 23, 2021. (Erin Schaff/Pool via Reuters)

Supreme Court Has Decided to Overturn Roe v. Wade, Leaked Opinion Suggests

By Matthew Vadum


May 2, 2022 Updated: May 3, 2022

A document that Politico describes as an “initial draft majority opinion” written by Justice Samuel Alito suggests the Supreme Court has decided to strike down Roe v. Wade, the seminal precedent that in 1973 wrested the regulation of abortion from the states and made the procedure lawful throughout the entire United States.

The leaking of the document, assuming the document is genuine and that it was in fact leaked, constitutes an unprecedented breach of Supreme Court protocol.

In a 2,400-word article time-stamped 8:32 p.m. on May 2, Politico describes the draft opinion as “a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision which guaranteed federal constitutional protections of abortion rights and a subsequent 1992 decision–Planned Parenthood v. Casey–that largely maintained the right.” The opinion is 67 pages long, followed by a 31-page appendix.

The unauthorized public disclosure of the draft opinion is likely to make public debate over the most controversial case of the current Supreme Court term even more impassioned.

The Politico article does not state exactly how the outlet came by the document, leading to speculation about its source. The article states Politico received a copy of the draft opinion from a person familiar with the court’s proceedings in a pending challenge to a Mississippi abortion law, along with other details supporting the authenticity of the document.

Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, who said he opposes Roe being reversed, told Fox News he couldn’t recall a Supreme Court opinion ever being leaked to the media.

“I have a theory, and it’s only a theory. I think this was leaked by a liberal law clerk who was trying to change the outcome of the case, either by putting pressure on some of the justices to change their mind, or by getting Congress to pack the court even before June, which is very unlikely, or to get Congress to pass a national right-to-abortion law, which would apply to all the states,” Dershowitz said.

The influential SCOTUSblog website weighed in on Twitter, writing on May 2 at 9:07 p.m.: “It’s impossible to overstate the earthquake this will cause inside the Court, in terms of the destruction of trust among Justices and staff. This leak is the gravest, most unforgivable sin.”

The document Politico bases its article on is an apparent photocopy of an original document that is marked “1st Draft” and that indicates it was circulated among the other justices on Feb. 10, 2022. It is unclear if the draft opinion has been changed since Feb. 10. Justices often change their minds in deliberations as they attempt to win over other members of the court to their point of view.

“Roe was egregiously wrong from the start,” Alito states in the document.

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” Alito writes in the document, which is labeled as “the opinion of the Court.” “It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

The draft begins: “Abortion presents a profound moral issue on which Americans hold sharply conflicting views. Some believe fervently that a human person comes into being at conception and that abortion ends an innocent life. Others feel just as strongly that any regulation of abortion invades a woman’s right to control her own body and prevents women from achieving full equality. Still others in a third group think that abortions should be allowed under some but not all circumstances, and those within this group hold a variety of views about the particular restrictions that should be imposed.”

The purported draft opinion on the case of Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, court file 19-1392, a challenge by the only state-licensed abortion clinic in Mississippi to the state’s Gestational Age Act, which allows abortions after 15 weeks’ gestation only for medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormality. Citing Roe, lower courts held the state statute was unconstitutional.

As The Epoch Times reported five months ago, during oral arguments Dec. 1, 2021, the Supreme Court seemed generally open to the possibility of answering Mississippi’s call to scuttle Roe v. Wade.

Roe v. Wade is “an egregiously wrong decision,” Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart said during oral arguments, appearing to foreshadow Alito’s words in the draft document.

“Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey haunt our country,” Stewart said, referencing Roe’s companion ruling from 1992, which held states can’t impose significant restrictions on abortion before a fetus becomes viable for life outside the womb, somewhere around the 24-week gestation mark.

“They have no basis in the Constitution. They have no home in our history or traditions. They’ve damaged the democratic process. They’ve poisoned the law. They’ve choked off compromise. For 50 years, they’ve kept this court at the center of a political battle that it can never resolve. And 50 years on, they stand alone. Nowhere else does this court recognize a right to end a human life.”

The Dobbs case is the first direct challenge to Roe in the high court since Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s appointment on Oct. 26, 2020, gave the court’s nominally conservative wing a 6–3 majority. Some conservative court observers argue the conservative-to-liberal split is more like 5-4 because they consider Chief Justice John Roberts to be a moderate or even a liberal because he frequently sides with liberal justices when the court seems on the verge of overturning a precedent disliked by conservatives. Barrett replaced the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died the previous Sept. 18.

Ginsburg was a defender of abortion but she spoke out about the problems she saw with the Roe decision. For example, at a May 11, 2013 appearance at University of Chicago Law School, she said her “criticism of Roe is that it seemed to have stopped the momentum on the side of change.” It would have been better if abortion rights had been brought about more gradually, preferably in a process that included state legislatures and courts, she said. Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:17-04:00May 3, 2022|Categories: Informational|0 Comments

2030 Psychological Agenda – Obedience Training for PreK-Adults Already Global with Billions of Funding for Full Control by Corey Lynn

The following are a list of a 9 part report researched and written by Corey Lynn of Corey’s Digs; sponsored by The Solari Report.  Read through each of them.  It’s important for We The People to understand what is happening within our “education system” .. and the problems we have had, are having and will have.
(Subsequent Chapters will be linked when available)

2030 Psychological Agenda – Obedience Training for PreK-Adults Already Global with Billions of Funding for Full Control

by Corey Lynn

This full 9-part report is available in a single PDF for download in The Bookshop.

**updated March 21, 2022

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:18-04:00February 21, 2022|Categories: Get Involved, Informational|Comments Off on 2030 Psychological Agenda – Obedience Training for PreK-Adults Already Global with Billions of Funding for Full Control by Corey Lynn

Gretchen & MDHHS “know better” than the CDC re C19 . . . 12/31/21

Gretchen & MDHHS “know better” than the CDC re C19 . . . Even Fauci said “There is the danger that there will be so many people who are being isolated who are asymptomatic for the full 10 days, you could have a major negative impact on our ability to keep society running.”  But Gretchen and other Michigan leaders don’t care about that, do they?

#RestoreFreedom #ConstitutionMatters #FactsMatter #MedicalFreedom #CommonSense #ItsAllAboutControl

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:18-04:00January 3, 2022|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on Gretchen & MDHHS “know better” than the CDC re C19 . . . 12/31/21

Article on Amicus Briefs – by Marion P. Hammer – USF Exec. Dir. – NRA Past President


DATE: November 5, 2021
TO: USF & NRA Members & Friends
FROM: Marion P. Hammer
  USF Executive Director
  NRA Past President


When people who are uninformed try to write about subjects of which they know nothing, it gets comical. Such is the case exposed in the article below concerning the NRA’s funding of academic research on the Second Amendment.

Many organizations, on both sides of the issue, fund academic research. Unlike manufactured disinformation and propaganda that is often quickly written, legitimate fact-based research takes time and must be funded.

The article below explains it well.


Bloomberg’s child propagandists discover amicus briefs and other cool legal stuff

By Lee Williams

I’m guessing the kids working at the Trace don’t get out much. They don’t seem to have a lot of life experience.

The Trace is, of course, the propaganda arm of former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Astroturf (not grassroots) anti-gun empire. The Trace describes itself as the “only newsroom dedicated to reporting on gun violence,” but a newsroom it is not. The Trace supplies propaganda for Bloomberg’s other anti-gun groups, which include Everytown and Demanding Moms, as well as any members of the media willing to cut and paste their stories.

Reporters at the Trace are activists, not journalists. They advocate for more gun control. That’s why Bloomberg pays them.

One of their young’uns must have learned about amicus briefs in school recently, because he penned a breathless piece of agitprop, titled: “The NRA Paid a Gun Rights Activist to File SCOTUS Briefs. He Didn’t Disclose it to the Court.”

“The NRA Foundation has paid an attorney and Second Amendment activist to write favorable briefs in Supreme Court cases, suggests a hacked document released on the dark web last week,” the Trace story claims. “Interest groups, including those fueled by dark money, seek influence at the Supreme Court in a range of ways, one being the production of amicus, or friend-of-the-court, briefs, which often extend and amplify the arguments of one side in a case.”

The author, Will Van Sant, wrote that amici authors must disclose who paid for their work, and he claimed that a brief written by David Kopel on behalf of NRA Foundation “makes no such admission.”

Kopel, I should point out, is a distinguished Second Amendment scholar with the Independence Institute. He has written amicus briefs in scores of legal cases involving the right to keep and bear arms. He has also written law school curriculum, dozens of scholarly articles and op-ed columns about every aspect of firearm policy in America and worldwide. It was his recent brief for what could be the most significant gun-rights case ever to come before the Supreme Court, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which drew the Trace’s ire.

There are more than 80 amicus briefs filed with the court for this landmark case, from both sides. I wonder whether the Trace activist bothered to check the bona fides of the briefs submitted by his boss or the other gun prohibitionists. In fact, I wonder why this even became a story. Amicus briefs are certainly nothing new, regardless of whether Van Sant just learned about them in a Law 101 class. (Trust me, Will, they’re actually used quite often.)

As to the dark webdark money and hacked Russian documents allegations, while they sound nefarious and add a certain James Bond-type tone to the story, the NRA Foundation’s support for Kopel and his employer is a matter of public record. The info is right there in the Foundation’s tax documents, which are posted online and available for the whole world to see – no undercover trips to Moscow needed.

I reached out to NRA for comment and they directed me to Marion Hammer, former NRA president and a current board member who also serves as NRA’s Florida lobbyist. She laughed at the secret-squirrel tone of the Trace’s story.

“For decades, and even before I was NRA President, the National Rifle Association and The NRA Foundation have carried out their nonprofit charitable missions by funding Second Amendment scholarship and education. This has never been a secret,” Hammer said. “NRA funds academic research and fact production because NRA wants the truth, not fake propaganda deliberately manufactured by Second Amendment haters for the purpose of deception.”

The funding provided by The NRA Foundation to the Independence Institute was not for Kopel to write any particular brief or other work, and the Independence Institute didn’t receive NRA Foundation funding during the period when the brief was written and filed, she explained.

“The article suggests that Mr. Kopel needed to disclose past NRA Foundation funding in his briefs. Well, what’s good for the goose should be good for the gander,” she said. “Perhaps a follow-up article by the Trace will discuss briefs written by people who received funding from Michael Bloomberg or the many anti-Second Amendment groups he funds, and what disclosures were made there.

“When will we see an article about how the billions from Bloomberg or other billionaires are spent on gun control? How about a simple display on their site stating who funds them and what their agenda is? I’m not holding my breath.”

Neither am I.

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:18-04:00November 6, 2021|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on Article on Amicus Briefs – by Marion P. Hammer – USF Exec. Dir. – NRA Past President

“Implied consent” defined by WHO

Do you trust your child’s school?  “Implied consent” defined by WHO – this article is from 2019.



[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:18-04:00November 5, 2021|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on “Implied consent” defined by WHO

From Kent County GOP 9/30/21

Yesterday, the MI Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission went rogue by drawing a congressional district draft map that includes the City of Grand Rapids with the City of Kalamazoo. Who has advocated for them to do this? No one! Grand Rapids and Kalamazoo have little in common and should NOT be considered a community of interest. The current maps also split many of the suburban areas of Grand Rapids from the City in a separate congressional district, including Ada, Sparta, Cedar Springs, Rockford, Lowell. Instead, these areas would be drawn in a congressional district all the way to the City of Midland! If you’re from one of these suburbs, you don’t say you’re from Midland, you say you’re from Grand Rapids. Clearly this was drawn to benefit the Democratic Party by packing their voters within one Congressional District. We cannot let this happen!

We need YOUR help to send a message to the Commission to reject this proposed map. Here are four ways you can help: 
1. SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENT: Drop the commission a note in the public portal letting them know you are opposed to the proposed congressional map and why. CLICK HERE to submit a written comment. 

2. SUBMIT DRAFTS OF MAPS: Submit your own Congressional District map that keeps Kent County whole. CLICK HERE to submit a map.
3. CALL-IN TO ONE OF THE COMMISSION’S MEETINGS: The Commission is meeting every day and is continuing to draw map drafts. We need individuals to attend the meeting virtually by Zoom and speak at the beginning of each meeting during public comment. Contact Kent GOP Political Director Mike Sullivan if you are willing to speak at 616-459-0141. 
The maps that are drawn by the Commission will be the district lines for the next 10 YEARS! Our party needs to take a stand today to stop this Commission from going rogue. Contact Kent GOP Political Director Mike Sullivan with any questions to concerns 616-459-0141. 

Mike Sullivan

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:19-04:00October 4, 2021|Categories: Get Involved, Informational|Comments Off on From Kent County GOP 9/30/21

They never had the authority to begin with.

It’s important to remember the health department never had the authority.  The school boards, superintendents nor schools have the authority either.

Listen to Katherine explain here:

#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #ConstitutionMatters #GetInvolved #KnowYourRights

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:19-04:00October 1, 2021|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on They never had the authority to begin with.

What is Katherine’s Evaluation of the Unlock 2.0 Petition?

This video covers Katherine Henry’s evaluation on the Unlock 2.0 petition and how it will not “Shut Down the Shut Down”.  

Take the time to listen all the way through.  Your time is valuable and we want to make sure you’re being productive in your fight for freedom. It’s important to be informed of what you are supporting.  

Emergency Management Act, 1976 PA 390, as amended, MCL 30.401-.421:

MCL 333.2253:

MCL 333.2453:

Original 061721 Video MDHHS Mandates – Legal? … :

Other video clips from the 061721 video;

What Are Some of the Topics Katherine’s June 17, 2021 MDHHS Video Cover?:

HIPAA Explanation from 061721 MDHHS Live:

Trespass Snippet fr MDHHS 061721 Video:

What is Law?:

“Health”, “Welfare” & “Safety”?  What do our US and MI Constitutions Say?:

Can the Health Department Really do That?:

#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment
[Posted by Lori DeVries]
By Katherine Henry|2022-09-23T11:04:28-04:00September 13, 2021|Categories: Informational, Videos|Comments Off on What is Katherine’s Evaluation of the Unlock 2.0 Petition?

Latest from Ottawa Impact – an Example of What You Can do in Your County!

From Joe Moss, Founder of Ottawa Impact:

Did you hear Ottawa Impact PAC launched Ottawa Precall?

No matter what district you live in, here is why precall impacts you:

Currently, there are 6 of 11 commissioners (a majority!) who indicate they are willing to do “everything in their power” to end the mandates from the local health department.

So… if the MAJORITY supports ending the draconian mandates by any lawful means… why aren’t they taking action?

After 1,000 people attended the last board meeting on Tuesday, August 24, 2021, we thought the commissioners would take immediate action to rectify the situation. They did not.

A week has passed. We the People must do “everything in our power” to end the mandates, since the commissioners will not. This means increasing the pressure, by whatever means appropriate and lawful, on the commissioners.

That is why every person in Ottawa County should sign the precall, no matter what district you live in – to help hold the commissioners accountable.

Ottawa Precall

Seize the opportunity to tip the scales of justice back towards the people. Put the commissioners in a position to choose between protecting your freedom or losing their job.

For Liberty,

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T23:15:58-04:00September 1, 2021|Categories: Get Involved, Informational, Local Government|Comments Off on Latest from Ottawa Impact – an Example of What You Can do in Your County!

Letters from local health departments.

These letters from local health departments mention the following laws:

MCL 333.5201(1)(a)

MCL 333.5205

MCL 333.5207

They are more sections of the Public Health Code Katherine has been warning us about since the beginning.

Have you read Michigan Public Health Code Act 368 of 1978?  You can find it here:

Have you watched this video?

Remember: The Legislature cannot give MDHHS authority to do something that it itself cannot do…

#RestoreFreedom #ConstitutionMatters #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #KnowYourRights

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:20-04:00September 1, 2021|Categories: Informational, Laws|Comments Off on Letters from local health departments.

Find out more about We The County and the founder, Michael D. Smith

Have you signed up with  Not sure what it is about?   Check out this interview with founder Michael D. Smith.

#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:20-04:00August 23, 2021|Categories: Get Involved, Informational|Comments Off on Find out more about We The County and the founder, Michael D. Smith

What Are Some of the Topics Katherine’s June 17, 2021 MDHHS Video Cover?

What Are Some of the Topics Katherine’s June 17, 2021 MDHHS Video Cover?

Watch this short excerpt to see what Katherine’s video from her MDHHS video, on 061721, talks about.  We need you to take the time to learn what your rights are, you can do that by watching the excerpts and/or the full video.

#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #ConstitutionMatters #KnowYourRights

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-09-23T11:01:59-04:00August 23, 2021|Categories: Informational, Laws, Videos|Comments Off on What Are Some of the Topics Katherine’s June 17, 2021 MDHHS Video Cover?

If you missed the first show about Tactical Civics, here are links for you to view it.

If you weren’t able to watch Tim Brown’s show this morning, talking about, you can catch it here:

He mentions putting links in the archives. You can go here to find those links and also connect to the video:

Make sure you tune in tomorrow morning at 6am EST for more information.

On FB:

On Rumble:

On the web address:

#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #ConstitutionMatters #KnowYourRights

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Lori DeVries|2022-09-23T10:38:17-04:00August 19, 2021|Categories: Call to Action, Informational|Comments Off on If you missed the first show about Tactical Civics, here are links for you to view it.

How Federal Dollars Are Tied To Schools In 2021 & Beyond – From: GOFM

 Thank you Guardians of Freedom Michigan for bringing this to our attention.

“How Federal Dollars Are Tied To Schools In 2021 & Beyond”
Go to this link to find the blog mentioned in this video:
By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:20-04:00August 18, 2021|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on How Federal Dollars Are Tied To Schools In 2021 & Beyond – From: GOFM

Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) filed an amicus brief in support of plaintiff college students who are declining COVID-19 vaccination ..

“Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), an educational nonprofit organization focused on science and statistics, filed an amicus brief in support of plaintiff college students who are declining COVID-19 vaccination at Indiana University (i.e., the case of Ryan Klaassen, et al. v. Trustees of Indiana University)”

Go to this link to get full details:

#RestoreFreedom #ConstitutionMatters #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #InformedConsent

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:21-04:00August 13, 2021|Categories: Constitution, Informational|Comments Off on Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) filed an amicus brief in support of plaintiff college students who are declining COVID-19 vaccination ..

Dr. Dan Stock, Indiana – Addressing the School Board

Here is it in text, and it’s entirety.

Dr. Dan Stock, Indiana

Addressing the School Board

“It’s hard to believe we’re 18 months into this and still having a problem; and I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is because we’re doing things that are not useful and we’re getting our sources of information from the Indiana State Board of Health and the CDC, who actually don’t bother to read science before they do this. 

I’m actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I am specially trained in immunology and inflammation regulation. And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is actually contrary to all the rules of science. 

So, things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses: they are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask. By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we’ve presented to you; it’s been given to the secretary. As a matter of fact, it quotes about three studies, sponsored by the NIH to that exact fact, even though the CDC and the NIH have chosen to ignore the very science that they paid to have done. 

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these viruses go away. The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long, waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged as has happened recently with these V’s, and then they cause symptomatic disease. Because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs—and this is a very important point—no one can make this virus go away. The CDC has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox, where we could make a virus go away. Smallpox had no animal reservoirs; the only thing it learned to infect was humans. That’s why we were able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this any more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs. So the reason you can’t do this is because you’re trying to do something which has already been tried and can’t be done. 

Equally important is that the V changes none of this, especially with this V. And I would hope this board would start asking itself, before it considers taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH, and the State Board of Health why we are doing things about this that we didn’t do for the common cold, influenza, or respiratory syncytial virus, and then ask yourself, why is a V that is supposedly so effective having a breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don’t do that?

And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called antibody-mediated viral enhancement. That is a condition done when V’s work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus, where a V used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which cannot be done right for a respiratory virus which has a very low pathogenicity rate —causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus become worse than it would with native infection. And that is why you are seeing an outbreak right now. 

In fact, in that flash drive you’re going to have coming to you and in the emails with six extra will be a study showing that 75% of people who have had COVID-19 positive symptom cases in Barnstable, MA, outbreak, were fully V’nated. Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person, V’nated, any differently than any person, un-V’nated. 

You should also know that no V, even the ones I support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection. In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only people who came down with symptoms were the people who were un-V’nated or unknown V status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for V’s, but a question that you should ask yourself— knowing that half of the people who came down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an un-V’nated or unknown V status individual —where did they get the disease? 

And the answer was: from the V’nated individuals. No V prevents you from getting infection. You get infected. You shed pathogen. This is especially true of viral respiratory pathogens. You just don’t get symptomatic from it. So you CANNOT stop spread. You cannot make these numbers, that you’ve planned on, get better by doing any of the things you’re doing. Because that is the nature of viral respiratory pathogens. And you can’t prevent it with a V because they don’t do the very thing you’re wanting them to do. And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you very bad scientific guidance. 

And instead, read the articles that are going to come on the email and are on this flash drive, and listen to the people in this audience tonight, who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and NIH is counterfactual. And that’s why you’re still fighting this with this V that supposedly was going to make all of this go away, but it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of COVID-19 develop in the middle of the summer, when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary for any V restriction to be considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having treated over 15 COVID-19 patients, that between active loading with Vit D, Iver _mect _in, and z_- nc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near the hospital. And we already have studies that show if you achieve a 25 hydroxy Vit D level greater than 55, your risk of COVID-19 death will drop down to one quarter of the population, average, for the United States. And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that show the same is true.

So if you were going to discriminate based upon V, you should also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy Vit D level, z_- nc taste test response, and probably previous infection, since there are also studies on that flash drive that show that people who have recovered from COVID-19 infection actually get no benefit from the V at all —no reduction of symptoms, no reduction of hospitalization and suffer 2 to 4 times the rate of side effects if they are subsequently V’nated. Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual. 

I don’t blame this board for that, because I know you aren’t scientists, and you thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH, and the Indiana State Board of Health, but I would encourage that instead you listen to the people out here in this audience and read what’s on that data drive. 

And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will happily come back and sit with you, individually, if you would like to explain the science behind this. And if you’re worried about being sued by somebody because you don’t follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you, you have a free, pro-bono, expert testimony at your disposal. I will testify in defense of this board turning down all recommendations, for free, at any time, in any court. 

Thank you.”

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Lori DeVries|2022-09-23T10:38:34-04:00August 10, 2021|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on Dr. Dan Stock, Indiana – Addressing the School Board

Is your employer or education system mandating …. ?

Is your employer or education system mandating your compliance to any medical procedure, treatment or service as a condition of employment or attendance?

Read and understand this fully before trying to apply it to your situation.

*Disclaimer: The information provided here does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice; instead, it is for general informational purposes to address vaccination mandates.

It is my desire to be fully informed and apprised of ALL facts before making medical decisions, and so; I write with regard to the matter of potential COVID-19 vaccine.

I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Can you please advise of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?

6. Can you please confirm that graphene oxide, a known toxin, is not in the vaccine? 

7. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employer?

8. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract COVID-19 and the likelihood of recovery?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1. You confirm that I will suffer no harm.

2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?

I would also advise that my inalienable rights are reserved.

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:21-04:00July 31, 2021|Categories: Informational|Comments Off on Is your employer or education system mandating …. ?

Get the Restore Freedom app today!


Have you been using the Restore Freedom app to get a better understanding of the Michigan and US constitutions?   Don’t rely on others to tell you what is in them, read and study them for yourself. 



#RestoreFreedom #MoreFreedomLessGovernment #ConstitutionMatters

[Posted by Lori DeVries]

By Katherine Henry|2022-08-21T22:57:21-04:00July 28, 2021|Categories: Constitution, Informational|Comments Off on Get the Restore Freedom app today!


Go to Top